Popular Presidents Can Affect Congressional Attention, for a Little While
نویسندگان
چکیده
Does the president have the ability to set the congressional agenda? Agenda setting is a prerequisite for influence, so this is an important element in understanding presidential–legislative relations. We focus on the State of the Union address and show that popular presidents can, indeed, cause Congress to shift attention to those topics most emphasized. The impact is tempered by divided government and time, however. No matter the state of divided government, however, popular presidents can direct congressional attention, at least for a little while. Unpopular presidents, by contrast, are irrelevant.
منابع مشابه
Mobilizing the Public Against the President: Congress and the Political Costs of Unilateral Action
Prior scholarship overlooks the capacity of other actors to raise the political costs of unilateral action by turning public opinion against the president. Through a series of five experiments embedded in nationally representative surveys, we demonstrate Congress’s ability to erode support for unilateral actions by raising both constitutional and policy-based objections to the exercise of unila...
متن کاملThe double-edged sword of grandiose narcissism: implications for successful and unsuccessful leadership among U.S. Presidents.
Recent research and theorizing suggest that narcissism may predict both positive and negative leadership behaviors. We tested this hypothesis with data on the 42 U.S. presidents up to and including George W. Bush, using (a) expert-derived narcissism estimates, (b) independent historical surveys of presidential performance, and (c) largely or entirely objective indicators of presidential perform...
متن کاملSelecting Influence? the Solicitor General
Scholars have devoted a great deal of research to investigating the role and influence of the U.S. Solicitor General (SG) as amicus curiae in the Supreme Court. Yet, we know little about the SG’s decision to file an amicus brief and how this relates to the SG’s success on the merits. We fill this void by examining legal, political, and administrative factors that affect the SG’s decision to par...
متن کاملAn Investigation into the Correlation between a Presidents Approval Rating and the Performance of His Party in the Midterm Elections
Over the years, American politics have become increasingly polarized. In today’s political landscape, a president cannot easily collaborate with the opposite party and pass legislature. Ideologies between parties have drifted apart to the point that one party generally stonewalls any legislature proposed by the other party. Because of this political landscape, it is paramount for a president to...
متن کاملGov2Vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Institutions and Their Legal Text
We compare policy differences across institutions by embedding representations of the entire legal corpus of each institution and the vocabulary shared across all corpora into a continuous vector space. We apply our method, Gov2Vec, to Supreme Court opinions, Presidential actions, and official summaries of Congressional bills. The model discerns meaningful differences between government branche...
متن کامل